2014年11月27日 星期四

影響世界的專利 - 舉例保存音質的光碟

幾百年專利記錄了人類科技發展的進程,十分完整地公開了各種發明的細節,十分珍貴。這回看到了中國專利局(SIPO)網站中發表了「影响世界的专利」,看到了以後十分興奮,除了希望能夠逐件地在這裡與各位分享外,更有不少內容可以成為上課的教材。

其中整理出有中國、美國、日本與歐洲等的經典專利,主要內容是來自美國專利,歐洲次之,另填入兩件中國專利,就大國來看,一定要這樣的!

從目錄顯示的各種發明,對科技有興趣的人應該要拿來看看,比如滑鼠、數位相機、拉鍊、光碟、安全帶、飛機、智慧卡、電話...等等。



這裡先列舉光碟的發明,就此檔案來看,發明人為James Trussell,相關專利為US3501586,當時的動機時如何保存音質(類比轉數位儲存),我相信在此之前已經有錄音的技術,但是音質很差(類比訊號),這個專利動機是要保存「音質」。


請求項1界定一個訊號記錄與回放的系統,元件有產生電子脈衝的輸入手段、光記錄手段(包括有產生光脈衝以形成編碼光訊號的單一光源、光影像記錄元件)、光回放手段(包括光偵測器)、輸出手段,其中技術主要是將記錄的光訊號轉為電子訊號後,可已還原聲音訊號。
1. A signal recording and playback system, comprising:
input means for generating electrical pulses which form a first digital coded electrical signal;
optical recorder means including a single light source supported in a fixed position and connected to said input means so that the pulses of said first digital signal are transmitted in series to said light source for producing a beam of light pulses which form a digital coded light signal corresponding to said first digital signal, and light beam deflection means for scanning said light pulses across a photographic record element supported in a fixed position to produce a photo record of said digital coded light signal in the form of a single series-recorded track of a plurality of small spots representing digital bits recorded at a high density;
optical playback means including at least one light detector supported in a fixed position and light deflection means for scanning the viewing field of said detector continuously along said track across the light image of said recorded spots, said viewing field being limited to approximately the size of one of said spots, for producing electrical pulses which form a second digital coded electrical signal corresponding to the digital light signal recorder on said photo record; and
output means connected to said light detector for transmitting substantially all of the pulses of said second digital signal from said detector through the same connection circuit to said output means.

審查引證案:
US3314075 *1965年1月22日1967年4月11日Prec Instr CompanyCoherent light beam recorder(同調光記錄器)
US3324237 *1963年8月26日1967年6月6日Nat Res DevTelevision and like data transmission systems(電視與資料傳輸系統)
US3337718 *1964年1月2日1967年8月22日Xerox CorpLight scan recording and readout(光掃描記錄器)
US3365706 *1964年4月15日1968年1月23日Gilbert W. KingPhoto-optical data storage and retrieval system employing error detection and error location identification components(影像光記錄儲存與錯誤偵測與判斷技術)
US3370504 *1965年3月29日1968年2月27日Technical Operations IncHigh speed facsimile method and apparatus(高速傳真方法)
US3391247 *1964年1月3日1968年7月2日Minnesota Mining & MfgTelevision signal recording with sampled audio recorded during horizontal intervals(電視訊號與聲音記錄的技術)
US3422219 *1964年9月24日1969年1月14日Technical Operations IncHigh density data storage system(高密度儲存系統)

從這些引證案來看,在1970年以前以光訊號記錄資料,甚至是電視影像記錄都已經存在。

補充,也曾經看到國外代理人手上拿著一個記載了每天一則經典專利的年曆,年曆日期應該也有對應到專利的公告或申請日,稍微搜尋了一下,這個網站可能有些資訊可參考,現在正在賣2015年年曆,每本約10元美金:http://www.patentcalendars.com/

不曉得有誰可以幫TIPO製作一份!

資料來源:
http://www.sipo.gov.cn/wxfw/pdf/P020100826371605978631.pdf

Ron

2014年11月26日 星期三

20年前的技術讓Apple判賠了2千3百萬美金 - 傳呼器的技術

這個訴訟關於目前蘋果行動產品內雙向交換資訊的技術被告侵害近20年前快過期的專利。

專利權人:Mobile Telecommunications Technologies LLC(背後是SkyTel network,SkyTel已經與美國傳訊公司AMS合併),從部分讓與資料來看,MTel公司顯然是一個專利控管公司,從讓與時間得知,為了要告Apple而組合這些專利,Apple Inc.也對專利提出IPR。
AMS(American Messaging Services, LLC)是個仍在運作過去傳呼器技術的公司,但是已經是運作在網頁、智慧型行動裝置上,甚至除了傳統文字傳呼外,還有影音內容。

侵權被告:Apple Inc.,產品為蘋果公司採用以Airport Wi-Fi技術傳訊的軟體,如iPhone、iPad、iPod touch中的iMessage、行事曆邀請功能、emoji(文字通訊的表情圖式)等功能。

系爭專利:
US5,809,428,這是一件在雙向傳訊的服務下處理未傳送的資訊數據的技術,也就是使用者傳送訊息後,伺服端會於一段時間內偵測接收端的情況,如果沒有接獲任何接收端的訊息,顯然是對方在關機或是沒有訊號的狀態,伺服端會記住這項訊息,直到接收端可以接受訊息時再以訊息通知。

1. A network operations center for transmitting and receiving messages to and from a wireless mobile unit comprising:
means for transmitting messages to the mobile unit;
means for receiving acknowledgment messages from the mobile unit;
means for determining whether an acknowledgment message is an acknowledgment to a data message or an acknowledgment to a probe message;
means for transmitting a probe message to the mobile unit if, after transmitting a data message to the mobile unit, no data acknowledgment message is received; and
means for marking a data message as undelivered and storing the undelivered data message if, after transmitting a probe message to the mobile unit, no probe acknowledgment message is received.

US5,754,946,這是優先權始自1992年的專利,揭露系統端基地台與使用者端裝置的通訊技術,可以在錯誤時讓使用者選擇(按鈕)重新傳送訊息。這時的行動端是指具有一個顯示螢幕的傳呼器(pager):

1. A mobile unit for transmitting and receiving radio frequency signals to and from a communications network comprising:
means for receiving a radio frequency message from the network;
a display for displaying said message;
a switch actuatable to specify a portion of the displayed message for which a user desires retransmission from the communications network;
means for transmitting, only upon actuation of the switch, a signal to the communications network requesting retransmission of said specified portion of said message; and
means for receiving said specified portion retransmitted from the communications network and for displaying the received specified portion on the display.

US5,894,506,這就是兩個個人裝置(傳呼器)雙向通訊的技術,在這個client-server架構下傳訊技術中特別是提供「罐裝訊息(canned message)」,也就是系統提供預設訊息讓使用者選擇傳送。

1. A method of communicating messages between subscribers to an electronic messaging network, comprising the steps of:
maintaining, at a network operation center, a first file of canned messages and message codes respectively assigned to the canned messages;
maintaining at a first terminal of a first subscriber a second file of canned messages corresponding to the first file;
selecting an appropriate canned message from the second file for transmission to a second terminal of a designated second subscriber;
sending the message code assigned to the selected canned message to the network operation center;
retrieving the selected canned message from the first file using the message code received from the first terminal;
determining whether the second terminal can receive the canned message in a text form or message code form; and
communicating the selected canned message to the second terminal in either message code form or text code form in response to the determination.

US5,590,403,揭露在雙向傳訊的技術下能夠透過訊號重疊的區域動態設定,傳訊時,伺服端先傳送系統資訊到各個傳訊的基地台,系統不斷地發出偵測訊號以得到接收端的位置,以根據各基地台所涵蓋區域動態調整訊號邊界,達到最佳且有效率傳送訊息的目的。

10. A method of communicating messages between a plurality of base transmitters and mobile receivers within a region of space divided into a plurality of zones with each zone having at least one base transmitter assigned thereto, the communication method comprising the steps of:
(a) transmitting substantially simultaneously a first information signal and a second information signal to communicate messages to the mobile receivers, the first information signal being transmitted in simulcast by a first set of base transmitters assigned to a first zone, and the second information signal being transmitted in simulcast by a second set of base transmitters assigned to a second zone;
(b) dynamically reassigning one or more of the base transmitters in the first set of base transmitter assigned to the first zone to the second set of base transmitters assigned to the second zone as a function of the messages to be communicated in an area, thereby creating an updated first set of base transmitters and an updated second set of base transmitters; and
(c) transmitting substantially simultaneously a third information signal and a fourth information signal, the third information signal being transmitted in simulcast by the updated first set of base transmitters, and the fourth information signal being transmitted in simulcast by the updated second set of base transmitters to communicate additional messages to said mobile receivers.

US5,659,891,揭露在有線頻寬的通道上的多載波技術,這是一個多載波的基礎傳訊技術,透過調整頻率偏差、比特率、載波頻率等得到較佳的傳訊品質,這個情況發生在一個區域內同時有多個傳輸的訊息。

1. A method of operating a plurality of paging carriers in a single mask-defined, bandlimited channel comprising the step of transmitting said carriers from the same location with said carriers having center frequencies within said channel such that the frequency difference between the center frequency of the outer most of said carriers and the band edge of the mask defining said channel is more than half the frequency difference between the center frequencies of each adjacent carrier.

US5,915,210,揭露同時處理多個載波的技術,技術在於系統端的基地台控制方法。

10. In a multi-carrier simulcast transmission system, a method for transmitting in a desired frequency band a! at least one message contained in an information signal, the method comprising the steps of:
generating a first plurality of carrier signals within the desired frequency band, each of the first plurality of carrier signals representing a portion of the information signal substantially not represented by others of the first pluarlity of carrier signals;
generating a second plurality of carrier signals within the desired frequency band, each of the second plurality of carrier signals corresponding to and representing substantially the same information as a respective carrier signal of the first plurality of carrier signals;
transmitting the first plurality of carrier signals from a first transmitter;
transmitting the second plurality of carrier signals from a second transmitter in simulcast with transmission of the first plurality of carrier signals from the first transmitter.

US5,786,748,揭露一種通知快遞送達的技術,將快遞訊息(ID)結合傳呼器號碼遞、預計送達時間交給傳呼器業者,透過傳呼器通知使用者送達的技術,訊息包括已送達與無法送達等。

1. A method for providing notification of an express mail delivery to an addressee thereof, comprising the steps of:
sending to an express mail tracking service an ID number assigned to an express mailing and a page number of a delivery notification recipient;
relaying the ID, page number, and an appointed time to a paging operations center;
providing a first indication to the paging operations center that the express mailing has been delivered to the addressee;
providing a second indication to the paging operations center that the express mailing has not been delivered to the addressee by the appointed time;
transmitting, responsive to the first indication, a wireless page message to the recipient as notification of the express mailing delivery; and
transmitting, responsive to the second indication, a wireless page message to the recipient notifying recipient that the express mailing has not been delivered by the appointed time.

由上述各專利的簡單描述可知,這些都是過去傳呼器的技術,不幸的是,這些至今還沒有超過20年,驚!但也差不多剩一、兩年,這個初步訴訟結果證明這些專利還有剩餘價值。

Case No. 2:14-cv-01057

專利權人(2013-4-2)提交的訴狀:
http://ia801407.us.archive.org/4/items/gov.uscourts.txed.143577/gov.uscourts.txed.143577.1.0.pdf

在11/17/2014東德州地方法院的判決中,陪審團裁定Apple的iOS7作業系統以及相關硬體裝置"蓄意"侵害以上專利,應賠償2千3百萬美金。

Mtel算是一類patent troll頗具侵略性,對ZTE, Samsung, hTC, RIM等公司都有提告,專利組合大約就用對Apple的其中之部分,主要如US5,809,428US5,754,946不太一樣就是了!


新聞來源:
http://www.cultofmac.com/303576/apple-slapped-23-6-million-fine-infringing-90s-beeper-patents/
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-18/apple-told-to-pay-23-6-million-over-pager-technology.html

Ron

2014年11月21日 星期五

Google與Rockstar和解 - 關聯式搜尋引擎技術

「Rockstar Consortium LP」為Apple Inc.與Microsoft Corp.的專利聯盟,其他主要成員還有Sony, Ericsson, RIM等,其中除了兩間公司貢獻的專利以外,多數來自過去的北美網絡(Notel Networks)的專利,看這樣的組合,顯然是針對Android陣營來的!

科技產業資訊室整理了Rockstar去年對各公司的專利爭議的一些資訊,還有曾經Google企圖買下Notel專利的競標關係:http://cdnet.stpi.narl.org.tw/techroom/pclass/2013/pclass_13_A370.htm

專利侵權訴訟(2013-10-31):
Rockstar當時對Google提告的相關專利有:US6,098,065; US7,236,969; US7,469,245; US7,672,970; US7,895,178; US7,895,183; US7,933,883

以下簡介這些專利,關於關聯式搜尋引擎的各種面向,看來直指Google的搜尋技術核心!

US6,098,065
這件是Rockstar直接從Notel取得,揭露一種關聯式搜尋引擎,不囉唆,專利範圍就1項,步驟也很直接明瞭,先取得使用者搜尋的請求,根據"使用者資料(profile)",從資料庫得到搜尋結果,將這個結果提供給使用者,之後描述這個搜尋方法採用了模糊邏輯演算法(fuzzy)。
1. A method of searching for desired information within a data network, comprising the steps of:
receiving, from a user, a search request including a search argument corresponding to the desired information;
searching, based upon the received search argument and user profile data, a database of information to generate a search result; and
providing the search results to the user
wherein searching the database includes correlating, as a function of a fuzzy logic algorithm, the received search argument and user profile data to particular information in the database, and providing the particular information as the search results.

US7,236,969
這也是Rockstar直接從Notel取得的專利,也是一個關聯式搜尋引擎,專利範圍共23項,其中主要請求項1揭露了根據使用者搜尋關鍵字提供關聯式廣告的方法,能夠根據使用者搜尋的關鍵字自另一個廣告資料庫取得相關的廣告,一併與搜尋結果提出到使用者端。
1. A method of providing advertisements to a user searching for desired information within a data network, comprising the steps of:
receiving, from the user, a search request including a search argument corresponding to the desired information;
searching, based upon the received search argument, a first database having data network related information to generate search results;
correlating the received search argument to a particular advertisement in a second database having advertisement related information; and
providing the search results together with the particular advertisement to the user.

US7,469,245
這件直接自Notel取得的專利是一個關聯式搜尋引擎,有25項範圍,請求項1界定提供廣告給使用者端裝置的方法,先取得使用者喜好,經取得使用者提交的搜尋請求時,根據使用者喜好選取相關廣告,再一起提供給使用者。
1. A method for operating an advertising machine implemented on at least one computer to provide advertisements via a communications link to a data processing device of a user, the method comprising:
receiving user preference input from the data processing device via the communications link;
creating user preference data based upon the user preference input;
receiving from the data processing device via the communications link a search request that includes a search argument;
searching at least one database using the search argument to produce search results;
selecting at least one advertisement from an advertisement database relating to the search argument using the user preference data; and
transmitting the search results together with the at least one advertisement via the communications link to the data processing device.

US7,672,970
這件也是Rockstar自Notel取得的專利,名稱也是關聯式搜尋引擎,專利範圍共有48項,請求項1界定一個連結到使用者裝置的廣告機器,其中的資料庫搜尋引擎與發廣告的機器,也是一種可以根據使用者搜尋的請求提供相關廣告資訊的技術。
1. An advertising machine implemented on at least one computer and operable to provide advertisements via a communications link to a data processing device of a user, the advertising machine comprising:
a communications interface operable to interface with the data processing device of the user via the communications link;
a database search engine operable to:
receive from the data processing device via the communications link a search request that includes a search argument; and
search at least one database using the search argument to produce search results;
an associative search engine operable to select at least one advertisement from an advertisement database based upon at least one of the search argument and the search results; and
the advertising machine operable to:
transmit the search results together with the at least one advertisement via the communications link to the data processing device;
receive a response from the data processing device via the communications link that indicates selection of an advertisement; and
based upon the advertisement selection, generate a fee record.

US7,895,178
這件關聯式搜尋引擎從Notel直接取得,專利請求項1界定關聯式廣告發送的技術,同樣先取得搜尋請求,並得到關聯的廣告,一併提交給使用者端,接著再取得更細節的搜尋要求(receiving search refinement input),提供修改後的搜尋結果,因此提供不同的廣告。
1. A method for operating an advertising machine implemented on at least one computer to provide advertisements via a communications link to a data processing device of a user, the method comprising:
receiving from the data processing device via the communications link a search request that includes a search argument;
searching at least one database using the search argument to produce search results;
selecting at least one advertisement from an advertisement database relating to at least one of the search argument and the search results;
transmitting the search results together with the at least one advertisement via the communications link to the data processing device;
receiving search refinement input from the data processing device via the communications link;
producing modified search results based upon at least the search refinement input;
selecting at least one other advertisement from the advertisement database based upon at least one of the search refinement input and the modified search results; and
transmitting at least one of the modified search results and the at least one other advertisement via the communications link to the data processing device.

US7,895,183
揭露一個關聯式搜尋引擎,自Notel直接取得,請求項1界定的廣告機器的運作,範圍就細節到顯示端,先取得使用者端的搜尋請求並得到相關廣告,之後以網頁格式傳送到使用者端,之後在終端顯示器上不同區域分別顯示搜尋結果與廣告。
1. A method for operating an advertising machine implemented on at least one computer to provide advertisements via a communications link to a data processing device of a user, the method comprising:
receiving from the data processing device via the communications link a search request that includes a search argument;
searching at least one database using the search argument to produce search results;
selecting at least one advertisement from an advertisement database based upon at least one of the search argument and the search results; and
transmitting the search results together with the at least one advertisement via the communications link to the data processing device in a web page data format that causes the data processing device to display the search results in a first display portion of a display of the data processing device and to display the at least one advertisement in a second display portion of the display of the data processing device.

US7,933,883
這件由Notel直接取得,揭露的關聯式搜尋引擎主要如請求項1揭露,也是一個廣告關聯式的搜尋方法,方法先建立與儲存使用者資料(profile),取得搜尋請求,得到結果,同時選擇與使用者profile資料關聯的廣告,一併傳送到使用者端。
1. A method for operating an advertising machine implemented on at least one computer to provide advertisements via a communications link to a data processing device of a user, the method comprising:
creating user profile data for the user;
storing the user profile data;
receiving from the data processing device via the communications link a search request that includes a search argument;
searching at least one database having data network related information using the search argument to generate search results;
selecting at least one advertisement from an advertisement database relating to the search argument using the user profile data; and
transmitting the search results together with the at least one advertisement via the communications link to the data processing device.


不侵權確認之訴(2013-12-23):
自然Google並不會坐以待斃,立即於兩個月後進行反訴:declaratory judgment of non-infringement,(新聞:http://www.cnet.com/news/google-fights-back-against-rockstar-patent-group/),宣告不侵權,提出不侵權證明。


和解(2014-11-12,雙方同意):
華爾街日報到導Google同意與Rockstar和解,主要消息來源:http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/11/20/us-google-rockstar-settlement-idUSKCN0J41ZJ20141120

法院決定書:http://www.iam-magazine.com/files/RockstarvGoogle.pdf

後語:

Notel Networks的專利佈局廣且深,值得探討與學習,甚至影響我們現在的生活!

從這些專利技術看出,現在Google或是各種搜尋服務無時無刻都在收集我們的資訊,真是不曉得是要用哪種心情面對!

這些系爭專利就是當年Notel破產後Google與其廠商積極要取得的專利池中的專利,顯然Google疑似採用了當中的專利技術,特別是關鍵字搜尋、廣告等,這回,雖然Google重申並未侵權外,確實也在要進行Discovery的時候低頭認栽,確認要結束這個痛苦的專利訴訟。

Rockstar Consortium成功地贏了這回戰爭,顯然Notel專利確實是有用而具開創性的,因此如Cisco等公司也都在這類訴訟下認賠;但如Apple等公司,也正在遭遇一些"早期"專利的困擾,使得在創新上需要付出不少這類額外的成本。

看來看去,Microsoft始終在這類訴訟與授權金的議題下占了不少便宜。 

資訊來源:
一點點其他資訊:
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2014/02/relecura.html

Ron

2014年11月19日 星期三

再領證程序不宜改變原案的焦點 - Antares Pharma v. Medac Phama (Fed. Cir. 2014)

再領證專利有兩個要求:original patent requirement、recapture rule。
再領證程序也是一種延續案策略之一:http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2014/11/blog-post_17.html

再領證(re-issue)程序是美國專利制度很特別的程序,可以讓公告領證專利作出一定的修正,也像是一般「更正」程序,請求項應由原說明書揭露內容所支持(original patent requirement),但更可在一定時間內(兩年)實質擴大專利範圍但不能改變原案在審查過程中曾經強調或恢復拋棄過的專利範圍(recapture rule),進入再領證程序的專利案會取代原母案,也需要經歷再次實質審查。
再領證程序中的專利就如脫開「處分」後的專利申請案,仍如新案審查一般可以進行延續案佈局,再次開枝散葉。

實例可參考Disney的案例:http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2014/01/disney-20012013.html

一些再領證的規定:
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2008/12/251-reissue.html
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2009/05/blog-post.html
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2013/01/blog-post_3580.html

案例討論:Antares Pharma v. Medac Phama (Fed. Cir. 2014)

此案來源為達拉斯地方法院因為認為專利無效而否決專利侵權訴訟中初步禁制令(preliminary injunction)的決定,原告Antares Pharma, Inc.於是上訴CAFC。

系爭專利:
系爭專利為2014年獲准的RE44,846(申請日:2012年6月22日,距離原案公告日在兩年內),原獲准專利為2010年8月17日獲准的US7,776,015

系爭專利涉及一種在流體腔體內以針輔助的噴射裝置,裝置可以噴射極細的藥劑,而"針"則可延伸到更長,並產生噴射壓力。

其中480是注射用針:



這個元件20就是爭議中提到的注射輔助針:

US7,776,015變更為再領證案RE44,846時並未改變原獲准Claims 1-22,但新增範圍Claims 23-37,
US7,776,015 Claim 1部分,其中有個主要元件"injection-assisting needle":
1. A jet injection device, comprising:
a housing member having distal and proximal ends;
a fluid chamber within the housing member holding about between 0.02 ml and 3 ml of a medicament comprising fluid;
an injection-assisting needle disposed at the distal end of the housing member, having an injecting end, and having an association with the fluid chamber to provide a fluid pathway from the fluid chamber through the needle, the injecting end of the injection-assisting needle having an axial opening for ejection of the medicament;
...

RE44,846再領證新增範圍,其中雖有針(needle)元件,但是這些並非是如Claim 1或原獲准專利範圍內的" injection-assisting needle "。

地院階段:
原告於地院的侵權訴訟主張medac Pharma, Inc.(被告)所製造產品侵害RE44,846的Claims 31, 34, 35, 37,顯然產品並未採用「injection-assisting needle」,於是被告主張專利無效,並且侵權不成立,理由是專利再領證違反專利法251規定,認為再領證所恢復的專利範圍違反「recapture rule」,也就是改變原母案答辯時所強調的技術焦點,或是恢復拋棄範圍(recapture),爭議就在母案獲准專利的焦點:產生噴射壓力的輔助針

CAFC階段:
由於地方法院認同被告的意見,認為再領證專利違反recapture rule,也就裁定專利無效,並駁回初步禁制令。原告上訴CAFC。

原告(上訴人)認為再領證符合"original patent requirement"這個一般原則即可,如一般延續案(DIV、CA)的規定,且這個原則已經適用一百多年!

CAFC法官認為,原告經再領證後的專利範圍有兩個部分,一個是原母案Claims 1-22,其焦點著重在"jet injection",也就是輔助針所產生噴射的效果;另一部分是新增的Claims 23-37,其焦點反而是強調安全特性,一個"jet"的描述都沒有,顯然形成兩個不同焦點的發明,即便兩者的仍有一致且相同的技術元件。

結論:
CAFC透過此案表明一個再領證案或許沒有太大的彈性,除了應該受到原揭露書所支持,還要符合「奪回原則」,即便可以實質擴大公告的專利範圍,但是不宜更動其中技術焦點(這與答辯過程有關),會被認為改變為另一個發明。

後語:
法院在此案例中,認為系爭專利在「再領證」程序後的專利範圍已經不符原專利的專利爭議焦點(不得改變專利實質主張的權利範疇,或是恢復曾經拋棄過權利),違法美國專利法第251條規定,因此裁決專利無效,採用了一個對再領證專利相對嚴格的標準


35 U.S.C. 251 Reissue of defective patents.(AIA之後)
(a) IN GENERAL.--Whenever any patent is, through error , deemed wholly or partly inoperative or invalid, by reason of a defective specification or drawing, or by reason of the patentee claiming more or less than he had a right to claim in the patent, the Director shall, on the surrender of such patent and the payment of the fee required by law, reissue the patent for the invention disclosed in the original patent, and in accordance with a new and amended application, for the unexpired part of the term of the original patent. No new matter shall be introduced into the application for reissue.
...

判決書中參考1942年最高法院的判例(US Industrial Chem v. Carbide & Carbon Chem, 315 U.S. 668 (1942)),最高法院認為再領證後的專利應該是在原獲准專利的發明範疇內,甚至是相同發明,因此再領證原意應該只是讓專利權人可以適當調整/更正專利範圍,而非重新修改為一個新的發明,即便仍是原說明書所支持的範圍。
"...the same invention described and claimed and intended to be secured by the original patent..."

判決原文:
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/14-1648.Opinion.11-13-2014.1.PDF

資料參考:Patently-O
Ron

2014年11月18日 星期二

不得商業使用的幾個著名地標


這些都是涉及著作權,是否有商標就沒有詳究。
但是,即便有關單位澄清"非商業使用"是OK的,這也是一種同意使用或合理使用,與權利歸屬無關,這裡僅片面記載一些情況,不涉及可以或不可以,因為版權存在與是否有關單位同意使用是兩件事。

一點參考:http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2014/11/blog-post_11.html

羅浮宮(the Louvre):
羅浮宮(the Louvre) 的版權宣告(英文版,資料來自Intellectual Property wiki)內外拍攝照片並非是零版稅,如果這些博物館、金字塔(IM Pei’s Pyramid)為圖像的一小部份,可能是可以接受的,比如風景照片小部份涵蓋了羅浮宮。

"The Louvre is one of the largest museums in the world. At its entrance sits a pyramid constructed by Ieoh Ming Pei.
As with most museums, no photographs of the exterior, interior or taken from the interior are suitable for Royalty-Free.
For Editorial content, imagery where the building and pyramid are a small portion of the content may be acceptable. Imagery where the entire building and/or pyramid are shown, or where either is the primary focus of the imagery should be avoided unless clearance can be obtained.
Images of the Louvre and IM Pei’s Pyramid may be acceptable as Rights-managed."
巴黎聖母院(Notre Dame de Paris):

巴黎聖母院(Notre Dame de Paris)則是表示這個大教堂建築物外觀影像是免版稅的,而內部影像需要被官方同意(資料來自Intellectual Property wiki)。

"Recognized as one of the finest examples of French Gothic architecture, the cathedral construction began around 1160 under the order of Bishop Maurice de Sully, and construction would carry on in stages until all elements were completed in 1345.
Exterior shots are acceptable in royalty-free collections. Interior shots are not suitable for RF creative, but may be appropriate for RF editorial collections provided consent has been obtained.
Images of the cathedral may be acceptable in rights-managed collections."

資料參考:
http://wiki.gettyimages.com/about/
http://www.photoblog.hk/wordpress/99623/%E7%85%A7%E7%89%87%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AF%E4%BD%9C%E5%95%86%E6%A5%AD%E7%94%A8%E9%80%94%E7%9A%84-10-%E5%A4%A7%E8%91%97%E5%90%8D%E5%9C%B0%E6%A8%99

Ron

ESA的太空船專利 - ROSETTA與PHILAE


這篇我只看外表,資料來自:http://www.esa.int/ESA

ESA有專利,但是你已經可以隨意仿冒了! (這樣講不是很準確,刪先,不過確實有些太空飛行器的專利已經過期)

歐洲太空局(European Space Agency)於11/13/2014完成登陸彗星的任務,甚至Google也以橫幅圖式"慶祝"。太空船有兩個部分,一個是太空船「羅塞塔號(Rosetta)」,在接近彗星時射出登陸器「費利號(Philae)」 。



CNN新聞:


「羅塞塔號(Rosetta)」與「費利號(Philae)」的關係:


「羅塞塔號(Rosetta)」



Spacecraft vital statistics  
Size
  Main structure 2.8 x 2.1 x 2.0 metres
  Diameter of solar arrays 32 metres
Launch mass
  Total 3,000 kg (approx.)
  Propellant 1,670 kg (approx.)
  Science payload 165 kg
  Lander 100 kg
Solar array output 850 W at 3.4 AU, 395 W at 5.25 AU
Propulsion subsystem 24 bipropellant 10N thrusters
Operational mission 12 years


「費利號(Philae)」



"可能"相關專利:
這個任務花了20年(其中太空航行10年),如果有專利,顯然已經過期,如果想要申請專利,技術明顯已經過了20年:
US4374579
US4562441

EP0350135

EP0455842


Ron

2014年11月17日 星期一

美國專利延續案的操作討論

美國專利延續案的操作討論

美國專利延續案指的是母案申請案在獲准前的後續申請案,一般知道的為與母案申請案平行進行(共存)的CA(continuation application)、DIV(divisional application)與CIP(continuation-in-part),延續案的特色是可以延續母案申請案的申請日或其優先權日的審查基準日的好處(美國專利法第120條),但是,其專利期限也受限於所繼承好處的最早母案的申請日。另有取代母案的後續案,如reissue、substitution。 以下圖式來自Patent It Yourself一書。

美國專利延續案的類別可參考:

CA、DIV為根據美國專利法第120條的延續申請案,其中DIV又如第121條的延續申請案,一般是基於美國專利局發出限制要求(restriction requirement)的後續選項。參考資料:http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2013/05/cadiv.html

CIP可參考:http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2013/05/cip.html

參考了來自一篇載於http://www.patent-innovations.com/的文章,分享如下:

一般來說,專利申請案一旦申請出去,早期主要修改彈性如國內優先權,否則不能新增內容,或是請求項範圍受限於一專利一發明的基本原則,不過不少也施行於各國的後續方案提供了申請人其他佈局策略參考,主要為DIV分割申請案。
到了美國,多了些彈性,比如CA案,可以提出一份與原申請案不同的說明書(實質內容不變)與專利範圍(應受母案揭露內容所支持),CIP案則又提供更有彈性地可以新增技術特徵的後續申請方案。

以上延續申請的申請案都應在其母案尚在懸宕(pending)狀態下提出,而延續案本身又可以繼續產生自己的延續申請案,即便其母案可能已經領證或拋棄,如此開枝散葉形成一個龐大的專利家族,這確實常見於大型企業的專利佈局上。

這篇文章將延續的佈局策略分為三種:被USPTO所限制、短期策略與長期策略。

被USPTO所限制專利主因是請求項包括了兩個以上的發明,或是包涵多樣的實施例,解決方法不同,多個發明就以分割申請案處理;多個實施例就看其上位請求項是否獲准而定,如果上位請求項不能准予專利,各實施例就只好以分割申請案繼續。

短期策略,這發生在有一專利申請案中的較廣範圍遭遇核駁,但可能其下位技術可以獲准,或是很有希望透過限縮獲准,但是卻又不想放棄較廣範圍的專利,於是,可以在接獲核駁意見後法定期限內(3-6個月)提出CA案,CA案主要範圍是母案中可以獲准(或可能經限縮而可獲准的)的範圍,為的是先拿到一個專利(可能比較貼近實際產品);為了取得具有侵略性的專利,母案則繼續答辯,期待獲准另一個範圍更廣的專利。

長期策略,有價值的專利佈局通常是多面相的專利保護佈局,比如以多個角度去界定一個技術(產品),讓專利相關技術不容易被迴避,因此價值可以更高。於是母案(可為多種母案、多個provisional applications)所涵蓋技術特徵應該多樣、豐富,使得延續案操作的角度更有彈性。這樣的專利佈局有利於授權、保護授權廠商利益、建立技術門檻、涵蓋更多的可能侵權者(上下游),自然也提高授權金或買賣金額。

不過,是否要以母案為基礎提出延續案(延續案專利期限受限母案),或是以不同的專利分別提出申請(分別有各自的專利期限),這端賴技術本身的特性,以及公司策略。

參考資料:
http://www.patent-innovations.com/documents/201204LimitedMonopoly-StrategicUseofContinuations.pdf

Ron

2014年11月14日 星期五

獨立請求項數目計算的討論(about Claims)

有些請求項計算的知識可能需要更正!

在美國,獨立請求項的數目影響了申請費用,一般原則是申請案獨立請求項3項或以下的數量並不會有額外費用,如果經答辯產生超過3項的新增獨立項,會收取超項費用。

這些費用規定可以參考MPEP607以及相關CFR規定:
...
III.   EXCESS CLAIMS FEES
(3/20費用規則)
37 CFR 1.16(h) sets forth the excess claims fee for each independent claim in excess of three. 37 CFR 1.16(i) sets forth the excess claims fee for each claim (whether independent or dependent) in excess of twenty. The excess claims fees specified in 37 CFR 1.16(h) and (i)
(再領證不會重複收費)
also apply to all reissue applications Under 35 U.S.C.41(a)(2), the claims in the original patent are not taken into account in determining the excess claims fee for a reissue application. The excess claims fees specified in 37 CFR 1.16(h) and (i) are required for each independent claim in excess of three that is presented in a reissue application and for each claim (whether independent or dependent) in excess of twenty that is presented in a reissue application.
...

The additional fees, if any, due with an amendment are calculated on the basis of the claims (total and independent) which would be present, if the amendment were entered. The amendment of a claim, unless it changes a dependent claim to an independent claim or adds to the number of claims referred to in a multiple dependent claim, and the replacement of a claim by a claim of the same type, unless it is a multiple dependent claim which refers to more prior claims, do not require any additional fees.

...

不過,如果獨立項寫成引用記載形式的獨立項(獨立項形式,但有依附其他項的描述),該項如何計算?
實務上,我曾看到不同的算法,這應該是因為USPTO判斷的人並非專利專業,而是一般費用計算的程序人員,所以會將引用記載形式的"獨立項"判斷為"附屬項"!

曾經討論的文章有:
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2013/01/blog-post_5213.html
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2008/08/blog-post.html
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2013/02/about-claims.html多重附屬之"獨立項"
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2008/10/about-claims-xi-mpep-section-60801n.html(各種形式的請求項,包括USPTO不接受的依附關係)

但最近又有人在討論這種獨立項的算法,其實引用記載形式的獨立項還是"獨立項",計算項次時應該算為獨立項,不過實務上應該如何,我又找了一些範例,甚至也有人介紹我參考以下網頁資料,其實內容也不少不確定的講法(網頁資料僅供參考,不確定內容來源?):

http://www.bpmlegal.com/howtopat7.html 

"It is possible to write claims which are a mixture of method and apparatus:

10. A widget made by the method of claim 1.
11. A method of using the widget of claim 10, comprising the steps of...
Many Examiners will not accept mixed apparatus and method claims, others will. It's best not to confuse things. 

Note: in the 2007 rules changes, which would have become effective November 1, 2007, the USPTO changed the rules to explicitly state that claims of this kind are to be considered independent claims, rather than dependent claims. Thus, the inclusion of this kind of claim would have put you over the three independent claim limit (for the purposes of filing fees). These rules were rescinded on October 8, 2009. Nonetheless, clearly the USPTO does not like this sort of claim and intends to do something about them at some point. It's best to avoid them."

其中有兩段話,在2007頒布的規則,USPTO將以上範例所示的引用記載形式獨立項視為"獨立項",不是附屬項;但有多了一段話說在2009年這個規則已經被撤銷?!!
總歸一句話,這種寫法不建議用!

具有引用記載形式獨立項的費用計算範例:
12/876,140(申請日:2010/9/5)
本案申請時獨立項有Claim 1、Claim 12,以及我們習慣認定為獨立項的Claim 23,Claim 23寫成引用記載形式的獨立項:
費用計算時將Claim 23視為獨立項,共有3項:
有趣的是,用Google Patents查閱專利時,一般會將獨立項用黑體標注,排版也凸出一些,將附屬項則用較灰的方式顯示,這時,這件案子把Claim 23顯示為附屬項,當然這是因為軟體程式自動以是否有依附關係而判讀的原因!

12/986,330(申請日:2011/1/7)
本案申請時獨立項有Claim 1(系統)、Claim 12(應用在系統的裝置)與Claim 13(方法),其中Claim 12寫成引用記載形式的獨立項:

費用計算時並不認Claim 12為獨立項:

14/199,149(申請日:2014/3/6)
此案為英國案再進入美國的申請案,申請時請求項大量採用多重附屬項,且也不排除多重依附多重附屬項的依附關係,甚至也包括向後依附、引用圖式的請求項!因此也做了初步修正(preliminary amendment),顯然是要符合美國專利撰寫規定而作出的修正,修正後獨立項有Claim 1與Claim 9,其中Claim 9寫為如前述請求項之一。


這是申請時的部分請求項,可以看到我們比較不適應的寫法:

 修改後的請求項,將多重附屬項改為單一依附的附屬項,Claim 9保留:
費用謹記一項獨立項,但將Claim 9拆成另外的8項,全部共有16項:

claim index:

再舉一例Apple的美國專利:13/181,913(US8520021)
申請時,獨立請求項Claims 1, 14為沒有其他依附關係的獨立項形式,Claims 21-24為分別界定不同發明標的的引用記載形式的獨立項
申請人提出申請案(7/13/2011)時所填寫專利範圍的超項數目將Claims 21-24視為"獨立項"(也就是Apple代理人也將這類請求項視為獨立項),因此共有6項獨立項,超過有3項獨立項,同時加上了超項費:

有趣的是,USPTO在發出申請收據時(filing receipt,7/25/2011),僅計算出兩項獨立項:
相關的費用也僅計算兩項獨立項,並沒有超項費,請見其中框住的內容:

但經獲准後,又有些費用的變化,算為4項獨立項!這點就真的很納悶了!


此案獲准專利時,權利要求的形式雖有些變化,卻也維持申請時的樣態,其中包括幾項不同發明標的的引用記載形式的獨立項,如Claims 14, 15, 23, 24,另有兩項比較"正常"沒有依附關係的獨立請求項1, 16。列舉其中幾項:

14. A computer system comprising:
one or more displays;
memory; and
one or more processors operatively coupled to the one or more displays and the memory, the memory having stored therein instructions executable by the one or more processors for performing the method of claim 1.
23. A computer system comprising:
one or more displays;
memory; and
one or more processors operatively couple to the one or more displays and the memory, the memory having stored therein instructions executable by the one or more processors for performing the method of claim 14. (其實Claim 14標的為"computer system")
24. A program storage device, readable by one or more programmable control devices, comprising instructions stored thereon for causing the one or more programmable control devices to perform the method of claim 14.


後語:
"引用記載形式獨立項",除了歐洲常見有多項附屬的形式外(不論獨立項或附屬項),其實這是不受歡迎的記載形式。

事實上,獨立項或附屬項,只是因為記載形式的名稱問題,每個請求項,不論是獨立形式或是附屬形式,都界定了一個發明的範圍,附屬項之所以為附屬項是因為在要求簡潔與明確的記載方式下,在大部分特徵已經被在前的請求項所描述的情況下,改為依附形式的附屬範圍。因此,如果一個原本為獨立項的請求項也因為簡潔的考量而寫為依附形式,是否這應該判斷為附屬項?如果寫為互不干擾的獨立項,常常是因為兩個獨立的發明,只是又在同一個發明概念下,可以在符合單一性的要求下以一件申請案提出。

這也是歐洲專利要求僅能提交一項獨立項的基本規則的原因,其他特徵應該都可以寫成附屬項才是,否則被視為有不只一個發明(但仍有例外,比如:http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2011/05/epc-rule-43-claimabout-claims-xxxix.html)。

經本次整理,好像可以看出一些規則!

Ron