2014年11月18日 星期二

不得商業使用的幾個著名地標


這些都是涉及著作權,是否有商標就沒有詳究。
但是,即便有關單位澄清"非商業使用"是OK的,這也是一種同意使用或合理使用,與權利歸屬無關,這裡僅片面記載一些情況,不涉及可以或不可以,因為版權存在與是否有關單位同意使用是兩件事。

一點參考:http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2014/11/blog-post_11.html

羅浮宮(the Louvre):
羅浮宮(the Louvre) 的版權宣告(英文版,資料來自Intellectual Property wiki)內外拍攝照片並非是零版稅,如果這些博物館、金字塔(IM Pei’s Pyramid)為圖像的一小部份,可能是可以接受的,比如風景照片小部份涵蓋了羅浮宮。

"The Louvre is one of the largest museums in the world. At its entrance sits a pyramid constructed by Ieoh Ming Pei.
As with most museums, no photographs of the exterior, interior or taken from the interior are suitable for Royalty-Free.
For Editorial content, imagery where the building and pyramid are a small portion of the content may be acceptable. Imagery where the entire building and/or pyramid are shown, or where either is the primary focus of the imagery should be avoided unless clearance can be obtained.
Images of the Louvre and IM Pei’s Pyramid may be acceptable as Rights-managed."
巴黎聖母院(Notre Dame de Paris):

巴黎聖母院(Notre Dame de Paris)則是表示這個大教堂建築物外觀影像是免版稅的,而內部影像需要被官方同意(資料來自Intellectual Property wiki)。

"Recognized as one of the finest examples of French Gothic architecture, the cathedral construction began around 1160 under the order of Bishop Maurice de Sully, and construction would carry on in stages until all elements were completed in 1345.
Exterior shots are acceptable in royalty-free collections. Interior shots are not suitable for RF creative, but may be appropriate for RF editorial collections provided consent has been obtained.
Images of the cathedral may be acceptable in rights-managed collections."

資料參考:
http://wiki.gettyimages.com/about/
http://www.photoblog.hk/wordpress/99623/%E7%85%A7%E7%89%87%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AF%E4%BD%9C%E5%95%86%E6%A5%AD%E7%94%A8%E9%80%94%E7%9A%84-10-%E5%A4%A7%E8%91%97%E5%90%8D%E5%9C%B0%E6%A8%99

Ron

沒有留言: