tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4311106493524131502.post7516897467417803043..comments2024-01-06T22:43:52.927+08:00Comments on enpan's Patent & Linux practice: 答辯美國專利法第101條的核駁理由EN & Jane's murmurhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16523573717925164267noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4311106493524131502.post-42877135338812898462012-01-11T09:11:57.321+08:002012-01-11T09:11:57.321+08:00我也不見得常常遇到,可能您是寫機構或製程這類比較明顯也硬體支撐的專利吧!
machine-or-t...我也不見得常常遇到,可能您是寫機構或製程這類比較明顯也硬體支撐的專利吧!<br /><br />machine-or-transformation test通常是配合101的核駁理由,提供審查委員很大的解釋空間,當審查委員認為專利範圍並無涉及具體結構或是被認定是純軟體專利,都有可能涉及這類核駁。<br />一般「機構」案比較不會碰到這種核駁理由,多半是「軟不軟、硬不硬」的專利會有這種掙扎。EN & Jane's murmurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16523573717925164267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4311106493524131502.post-39543823289379610712012-01-10T10:00:08.182+08:002012-01-10T10:00:08.182+08:00machine-or-transformation test 板大,不曉得這測試,是否寫在MPEP裡...machine-or-transformation test 板大,不曉得這測試,是否寫在MPEP裡面咧?<br /><br />工作兩年多我還沒碰上這東西...是否可請大大說明指點一下@@"<br /><br />另外,不知道大大對於MPEP之閱讀有何見解?Good bye my lovehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17996092091760962179noreply@blogger.com