連結：
著作權基本上是「憲法保障」著作人的權利，著作人生成（用各種工具、人本身）的著作受到著作權法保護，以下是一些法條摘要。
【中華民國著作權法】
關於"攝影"著作權的定義：
第3條 本法用詞，定義如下：
一、著作：指屬於文學、科學、藝術或其他學術範圍之創作。
...
第5條 本法所稱著作，例示如下︰
一、語文著作。
二、音樂著作。
三、戲劇、舞蹈著作。
四、美術著作。
五、攝影著作。
六、圖形著作。
七、視聽著作。
八、錄音著作。
九、建築著作。
十、電腦程式著作。
前項各款著作例示內容，由主管機關訂定之。
著作生成當下即受到保護（創作保護主義）：
第10條
著作人於著作完成時享有著作權。但本法另有規定者，從其規定。
著作人格權：
第15條 著作人就其著作享有公開發表之權利。但公務員，依第十一條及第十二條規定為著作人，而著作財產權歸該公務員隸屬之法人享有者，不適用之。
...
著作權保護期限：
第30條 著作財產權，除本法另有規定外，存續於著作人之生存期間及其死亡後五十年。
（相關法律規定在第30～35條，如共同著作、法人著作...）
合理使用：
第65條 著作之合理使用，不構成著作財產權之侵害。
著作之利用是否合於第四十四條至第六十三條所定之合理範圍或其他合理使用之情形，應審酌一切情狀，尤應注意下列事項，以為判斷之基準：
一、利用之目的及性質，包括係為商業目的或非營利教育目的。
二、著作之性質。
三、所利用之質量及其在整個著作所占之比例。
四、利用結果對著作潛在市場與現在價值之影響。
著作權人團體與利用人團體就著作之合理使用範圍達成協議者，得為前項判斷之參考。
前項協議過程中，得諮詢著作權專責機關之意見。
參考：TIPO圖解「著作權合理使用原則」筆記（https://enpan.blogspot.com/2024/03/tipo_13.html）。
另可參考：合理使用著作權標的的四個判斷因素 - Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC (Fed. Cir. 2018)（https://enpan.blogspot.com/2018/03/oracle-america-inc-v-google-llc-fed-cir.html）。
補充美國版權法相關法規：
17 U.S. Code § 106 - Exclusive rights in copyrighted works（https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/106）
Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following:（著作權人實施創作與其授權的專屬權利）
(1)to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords;（重製權）
(2)to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;（衍生著作權）
(3)to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;（通過銷售與其他權利轉移的散佈權）
(4)in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly;（公開展示）
(5)in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and（公開展示）
(6)in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.（數位傳輸）
17 U.S. Code § 504 - Remedies for infringement: Damages and profits（https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/504）
(a)In General.—Except as otherwise provided by this title, an infringer of copyright is liable for either—（著作權侵權者的責任）
(1)the copyright owner’s actual damages and any additional profits of the infringer, as provided by subsection (b); or（實際損失+額外利潤）
(2)statutory damages, as provided by subsection (c).（法定賠償）
(b)Actual Damages and Profits.—（實際損失與利潤）
The copyright owner is entitled to recover the actual damages suffered by him or her as a result of the infringement, and any profits of the infringer that are attributable to the infringement and are not taken into account in computing the actual damages. In establishing the infringer’s profits, the copyright owner is required to present proof only of the infringer’s gross revenue, and the infringer is required to prove his or her deductible expenses and the elements of profit attributable to factors other than the copyrighted work.
(c)Statutory Damages.—（法定賠償金額）
(1)Except as provided by clause (2) of this subsection, the copyright owner may elect, at any time before final judgment is rendered, to recover, instead of actual damages and profits, an award of statutory damages for all infringements involved in the action, with respect to any one work, for which any one infringer is liable individually, or for which any two or more infringers are liable jointly and severally, in a sum of not less than $750 or more than $30,000 as the court considers just. For the purposes of this subsection, all the parts of a compilation or derivative work constitute one work.
(2)In a case where the copyright owner sustains the burden of proving, and the court finds, that infringement was committed willfully, the court in its discretion may increase the award of statutory damages to a sum of not more than $150,000. In a case where the infringer sustains the burden of proving, and the court finds, that such infringer was not aware and had no reason to believe that his or her acts constituted an infringement of copyright, the court in its discretion may reduce the award of statutory damages to a sum of not less than $200. The court shall remit statutory damages in any case where an infringer believed and had reasonable grounds for believing that his or her use of the copyrighted work was a fair use under section 107, if the infringer was:
（合理使用範圍）
(i) an employee or agent of a nonprofit educational institution, library, or archives acting within the scope of his or her employment who, or such institution, library, or archives itself, which infringed by reproducing the work in copies or phonorecords; or （非營利教育機構、圖書館、檔案管理）
(ii) a public broadcasting entity which or a person who, as a regular part of the nonprofit activities of a public broadcasting entity (as defined in section 118(f)) infringed by performing a published nondramatic literary work or by reproducing a transmission program embodying a performance of such a work.（公共廣播）
(3)
(A)In a case of infringement, it shall be a rebuttable presumption that the infringement was committed willfully for purposes of determining relief if the violator, or a person acting in concert with the violator, knowingly provided or knowingly caused to be provided materially false contact information to a domain name registrar, domain name registry, or other domain name registration authority in registering, maintaining, or renewing a domain name used in connection with the infringement.（推翻侵權者作為）
(B)Nothing in this paragraph limits what may be considered willful infringement under this subsection.
(C)For purposes of this paragraph, the term “domain name” has the meaning given that term in section 45 of the Act entitled “An Act to provide for the registration and protection of trademarks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, and for other purposes” approved July 5, 1946 (commonly referred to as the “Trademark Act of 1946”; 15 U.S.C. 1127).
(d)Additional Damages in Certain Cases.—（額外賠償）
In any case in which the court finds that a defendant proprietor of an establishment who claims as a defense that its activities were exempt under section 110(5) did not have reasonable grounds to believe that its use of a copyrighted work was exempt under such section, the plaintiff shall be entitled to, in addition to any award of damages under this section, an additional award of two times the amount of the license fee that the proprietor of the establishment concerned should have paid the plaintiff for such use during the preceding period of up to 3 years.
都說是"complete guide"，大家可參考：https://www.ts-firm.com/post/copyright-law-for-photographers，其中特別指出如何維護自己攝影創作的權利與相關賠償、金額... 。
my two cents:
本篇攝影作品作者是我本人，沒有AI輔助或特效（現在分享作品都還要這樣宣告嗎？）
編者非著作權專業，為了分享而分享，以上法律資訊有"參考"AI的回應，還有Google翻譯的幫忙，而AI回應有誤，在此雖僅摘要，仍有初步審視，如果有任何錯誤或補充還請幫忙。
Ron
