相關法條:
潘榮恩專利部落格、專利實務、專利筆記與Linux
enpan's Patent & Linux practice
(http://enpan.blogspot.tw/, http://enpan.blogspot.com/)
(接受委託安排課程)
ronpan@gmail.com
2026年10月2日 星期五
犀牛盾 v. 惡魔殼「違反公平交易法」判決歷程筆記
相關法條:
2024年10月26日 星期六
犀牛盾RHINOSHIELD v. 惡魔殼DEVILCASE「違反公平交易法」之判決 - 最高法院民事裁定113年度台上字第1585號


2022年3月2日 星期三
貶抑特定人物的商標 v. 言論自由 - IN RE: STEVE ELSTER (Fed. Cir. 2022)
如此,是否上述"15 U.S. Code § 1052(a)(c)"中涉及駁回商標的規定與憲法牴觸嗎?根據判決文的描述,即便連系爭商標的申請人也都認為上述法條並未涉及歧視,CAFC仍認為本案討論的商標申請案相關的駁回依據已經涉及基於內容的歧視,並表示這種歧視不能以令人信服的或不符政府實質利益。
THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY DOES NOT PROHIBIT ANY PUBLICATION OF MATTER WHICH IS OF PUBLIC OR GENERAL INTEREST. (隱私權不能禁止符合公共利益發布的事項)。
2021年8月16日 星期一
發明人文件不確實形成的訴訟阻礙 - BobCar Media v. Aardvark (S.D.N.Y. 2018)
Bobcar第一時間並未提交讓渡證明文件,也承認因為文件遺失,無法提交最初申請時的讓渡文件,法院也傾向判定Bobcar缺乏訴訟立場。不過,在最佳證據規則下(the “best evidence” rule),法院也提供Bobcar機會補件。若未在法院指定時間前補件,本訴訟案將被撤銷。
1. 是否CAFC可以用一句話就駁回上訴(就確認地院判決)?
2021年4月22日 星期四
Tile v. Airtag 的專利筆記
本文發想自新聞:
- https://techcrunch.com/2021/04/20/tile-bashes-apples-new-airtag-as-unfair-competition/
- https://www.macrumors.com/2021/04/20/tile-complains-about-airtag-launch/
- https://www.macrumors.com/guide/airtags/
當強大的對手推出與自己相似的產品時,除了義憤填膺外,就來審視自己的「武器」有哪些,如果是經營了一陣子的產品,將可能具有佔有率優勢,如果還有專利權,也表示擁有先發制人的地位,但是所謂「強大的對手」是擁有智慧型手機平台的Apple時,那壓力就變得沈重。
從新聞得知,Tile公司(Tile Inc.)的找物收發器(Tiles)有90%市占率,就是一個設計精良的藍牙收發器,可以附掛在任何怕遺失的物品上,開啟APP或相關程式後,可以循著這些收發器建立的網路定位到物品。而Apple發布最新(今天凌晨)的產品中,有個Airtag,就是類似的東西。
當Apple發表新產品,即便是事前已經可以預料這些產品,還是讓Tile Inc.作出立即反應,包括準備去國會備案,要求國會關注Apple將來的發展可能衍生出不公平競爭的問題。這個問題可能衍生壟斷市場的不公平競爭議題,理由是平台業者若參與競爭,確實會威脅倚賴這個平台生存的企業。(編按,這樣就想到有些賣場、便利商店中可以看到貼他們自己品牌的商品,與其他上架商品競爭的情況)
(圖案截自:https://www.apple.com/airtag/)
(圖案截自:https://www.thetileapp.com/)
這個小小的東西其實應該不是多新的技術,只是商品化,加上商品本身有裝飾性,又很有用,週邊效應所帶出的新穎功效,只要用心布局,仍有機會獲得專利。
Tile Inc.美國專利:我用"Tile Inc."當作專利權人搜尋美國專利,查到173件領證專利。
US10,945,093 Systems and methods for locating a tracking device
1. A method comprising:
associating, by a tracking system using at least one processor, a user with a tracking device owned by the user;
in response to the tracking device coming within a threshold proximity of a first mobile device of the user, receiving, by the tracking system, a location of the first mobile device, an identity of the tracking device, and an identity of the first mobile device and storing the received location as a last known location of the tracking device; and
in response to the tracking device coming within a threshold proximity of a second mobile device of a second user, receiving, by the tracking system, a location of the second mobile device and the identity of the tracking device and storing the received location as a last known location of the tracking device without storing an identity of the second mobile device, wherein the second mobile device is configured to provide the location of the second mobile device to the tracking system without notifying the second user that the tracking device was detected by the second mobile device and without providing the identity of the second mobile device.
US10,911,904 Tracking device presence detection and reporting by access points
1. A method for locating a tracking device, comprising:
detecting, by an access point, a tracking device within a proximity of the access point;
while the tracking device and the access point are communicatively coupled, providing, by the access point, a location of the access point and an identifier of the tracking device to a tracking server at a first frequency; and
while the tracking device and the access point are not communicatively coupled, providing, by the access point, a location of the access point and an identifier of the tracking device to the tracking server at a second frequency greater than the first frequency.
D881,729 Tracking device
D881,048 Tracking device
D880,320 Tracking device
US10,536,801 Tracking device operation in safety-classified zone

(編按,簡單查Tile Inc.專利,用名稱來看,可以看出非常多的功能布局,從圖式快速瀏覽,可以看出許多專利都是基於相同的概念產出的,加上不少的設計專利,感覺是已經「超前部署」,就看怎麼面對Apple挾強大的平台優勢(幾乎是內建功能)侵蝕Tile Inc.的市占率,以及將來可能的侵權爭議。)
Apple Inc.美國專利:(其實找東西的專利還不少,還蠻有趣的,但Apple的專利太多樣性了,簡單的檢索不容易找到關鍵專利,列兩篇來看看人家怎麼寫的)
US10,410,485 Devices and methods for locating accessories of an electronic device
1. A method comprising:
playing a media item on an electronic device;
detecting, via the electronic device, disconnection of an accessory from the electronic device, wherein the disconnection of the accessory is detected to have occurred while the media item is playing on the electronic device;
detecting, via the electronic device, a title of the media item;
storing the title on the electronic device;
receiving a request at the electronic device for assistance in locating the accessory; and
presenting the title on the electronic device in response to the request for assistance in locating the accessory as a reminder of the media item that had been playing when the disconnection of the accessory occurred.
US10,356,553 Precise indoor localization and tracking of electronic devices
1. A method, comprising:
performing, via a first wireless electronic device, indoor localization and tracking of a plurality of other wireless electronic devices within an indoor environment, comprising: performing front-back detection;
performing stationary node detection;
performing angle of arrival (AoA) error correction; and
performing field of view (FOV) filtering;
wherein performing indoor localization and tracking of the plurality of other wireless electronic devices comprises providing an indication of a physical location of the plurality of other wireless electronic devices within the indoor environment, wherein performing front-back detection comprises calculating a range matrix comprising range data of each of the plurality of other wireless electronic devices with respect to the first wireless electronic device, calculating an angle of arrival (AoA) matrix comprising AoA data of each of the plurality of other wireless electronic devices with respect to the first wireless electronic device, or both
US7552031 Personal items network, and associated methods
1. A personal items network, comprising a plurality of items, each item having:
Ron
2021年1月12日 星期二
本篇僅後續追蹤案件 - 任天堂の対マリカー勝訴が確定
異議理由(參考Google翻譯):
系爭商標「マリカー」撤銷理由(摘錄審判理由):
2020年12月16日 星期三
關於誤導言論以及初步禁令的判斷 - Myco Industries v. BlephEx, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2020)
原告/反被告被上訴人("Plaintiff/Counter Defendant-Appellee"):MYCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
反被告被上訴人:JOHN R. CHOATE
被告/反原告上訴人/專利權人("Defendant/Counter Plaintiff-Appellant"):BLEPHEX, LLC
被告上訴人:JAMES RYNERSON
系爭專利:US9,039,718
判決日:April 3, 2020
本案緣起專利權人Blephex向Myco提出侵權告訴,但特別的是,Myco(在此案為原告)反告Blephex對其產品與是否侵權的議題作出錯誤而誤導的言論,結果地院作出決定是「禁止BlephEx宣稱Myco侵權以及以侵權訴訟來脅迫Myco的潛在客戶」的初步禁止令(preliminary injunction),BlephEx提出上訴。

系爭專利US9,039,718關於一種治療眼疾的方法,如眼瞼炎與乾眼症,方法為使用機電裝置相對於眼睛移動拭子以產生週期性運動,去除眼中的碎屑。
Claim 1:
1. A method of treating an eye for an ocular disorder with a swab operably connected to an electromechanical device, wherein the eye has an eyelid margin and includes a removable debris, the method comprising;
effecting movement of the swab relative to the electromechanical device, the swab having at least a portion thereof configured to access an inner edge portion of the eyelid margin;
while the swab is being moved by the electromechanical device, contacting a portion of the eye between the eyelashes and the inner edge of the eyelid margin that includes the removable debris with the swab thereby impacting the debris with the swab to remove debris from the eye.
解釋專利範圍與審查歷史有關,申請人在系爭專利審查期間曾於面詢中表示系爭專利與先前技術Grenon的差異在於:前案並未有一個觸碰眼瞼邊緣內的swab(醫用海綿)。
侵權訴訟最重要的步驟之一就是解釋專利範圍,其中之一爭議就是「inner edge(inner edge of the eyelid margin)」的解釋,關於系爭專利宣稱可以治療眼睛疾病的方法。在習知方法中,當診斷出有眼瞼的疾病時,主要是以抗生素與類固醇來治療,而病人自己用藥物塗抹在眼瞼時,最重要的步驟是清潔,系爭專利就是提出連結到機電裝置的海綿(Swab)移除在眼瞼上的細屑,專利內容就是描述以此機電控制的海綿接觸內眼瞼以清潔內眼瞼內的細屑。








































