案例:US 8712797 B1(B1表示未早期公開前就獲准專利)
涉及一種從多個藥房利益管理器提供藥品價格資訊的方法和系統(Methods and system for providing drug pricing information from multiple pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs))
此案申請日為2014/1/21(優先權日為一件provisional application:2013/2/26),同時提出優先審查(prioritized examination),過程中權利範圍維持申請時的樣貌,並未修改,之後於2014/3/6發出核准通知(notice of allowance),繳費後,在2014/4/9領證通知。前後獲准不到兩個月,到領證公告差不多三個月。
送件時同時提出加速審查申請:
費用多了一筆$2000:
USPTO核准優先審查,其中並可見到符合優先審查的條件:
權利範圍並未修改而全數獲准:
可以看看其中涉及商業方法的權利範圍,撰寫權利範圍的人顯然嘗試綁住硬體特徵,除了藥品、藥房本身的特徵外,硬體特徵如computer processor、display,另有軟體形成的主角"pharmacy benefit manager (PBM)",但整體看來,如果進入訴訟,恐怕很難主張權利。
1. A method of displaying prices for drugs from a plurality of pharmacy benefit managers, the method comprising:
providing a user interface using a computer processor;
receiving from the user interface information identifying a first drug;
obtaining a first set of prices for the first
drug that is associated with a first pharmacy benefit manager (PBM),
wherein a pharmacy benefit manager processes a claim relating to a drug
and has an agreement with a pharmacy relating to a price of one or more
drugs, the first set of prices comprising at least one price for the
first drug and each price in the first set of prices being determined by
an agreement between the first PBM and a pharmacy;
obtaining a second set of prices for the first
drug that is associated with a second pharmacy benefit manager, the
second set of prices comprising at least one price for the first drug
and each price in the second set of prices being determined by an
agreement between the second PBM and a pharmacy; and
displaying in the user interface at least a portion of the first set of prices and the second set of prices.
審查過程中可以看出審查委員設定美國專利主分類為705,另也於Google/Patents中找尋先前技術。雖因此找到了一些前案,最後究竟是因為先前技術並未教示「從兩個不同的藥房利益管理器取得幾組的價格」這個特徵,習知技術僅討論到從從藥房利益管理器(PBM)取得價格折扣,因此直接核准專利。
美國的優先審查(track one,AIA)
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2011/11/track-i-examination-viii.html
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2011/04/4000us.html
發明人配合提交意見的Accelerated Examination Request(超快,條件是要申請人自行提出類似審查意見的聲明)
http://enpan.blogspot.tw/2009/09/blog-post_10.html
資料參考:
http://patentlyo.com/patent/2014/05/business-method-patent.html
Ron
沒有留言:
張貼留言